Author Topic: Flashpoint Cantina (OOC)  (Read 178338 times)

Offline SWSF Eidolon

  • Space Pope
  • Administrator
  • SWSF Member
  • Posts: 2,249
Re: Flashpoint Cantina (OOC)
« Reply #105 on: September 26, 2019, 08:02:08 PM »

Ping was the one to be spanked.
~J
SWSF 'til Death

Offline SWSF Hale

  • FP Game Master
  • Administrator
  • SWSF Member
  • Posts: 2,220
  • "I find your lack of faith disturbing..."
Re: Flashpoint Cantina (OOC)
« Reply #106 on: September 26, 2019, 08:06:28 PM »
FALSE START ON THE PLAY.

REVEAL DELAY.

1 DAY PENALTY. REPEAT FIRST DOWN.

LUCIDIUS HALE
STAR WARS SIMMING FORUM

Offline SWSF Eidolon

  • Space Pope
  • Administrator
  • SWSF Member
  • Posts: 2,249
Re: Flashpoint Cantina (OOC)
« Reply #107 on: September 26, 2019, 10:39:57 PM »

Under no circumstance am I giving a guy a foot massage.
~J
SWSF 'til Death

Offline SWSF Hale

  • FP Game Master
  • Administrator
  • SWSF Member
  • Posts: 2,220
  • "I find your lack of faith disturbing..."
Re: Flashpoint Cantina (OOC)
« Reply #108 on: September 27, 2019, 04:57:19 PM »
What say you Team NR? Should we post our financials and let the IR follow-up? Maybe that might offset the 3 vs 2 dynamic, and help get this ball rolling!!

LUCIDIUS HALE
STAR WARS SIMMING FORUM

Offline EmperorSeverus

  • Nostalgia
  • SWSF Member
  • Posts: 289
Re: Flashpoint Cantina (OOC)
« Reply #109 on: September 27, 2019, 05:46:38 PM »
I will be online at 8 PM sharp tonight to PM you Hale. If you're online, respond and we can agree to go ahead and post financials at basically the same time. Thought I can't commit to a launch until my side responds to the last PM I sent.

@gallpizi and @bishio please check your PM's.
EMPEROR SEVERUS
IMPERIAL GALACTIC EMPIRE - RESURRECTED

Offline SWSF Hale

  • FP Game Master
  • Administrator
  • SWSF Member
  • Posts: 2,220
  • "I find your lack of faith disturbing..."
Re: Flashpoint Cantina (OOC)
« Reply #110 on: September 27, 2019, 06:12:51 PM »
I will post tonight between 7:50 and 8:00. Come what may!
LUCIDIUS HALE
STAR WARS SIMMING FORUM

Offline SWSF Hale

  • FP Game Master
  • Administrator
  • SWSF Member
  • Posts: 2,220
  • "I find your lack of faith disturbing..."
Re: Flashpoint Cantina (OOC)
« Reply #111 on: September 27, 2019, 08:46:58 PM »
Posted in NRDF (as an edit).
LUCIDIUS HALE
STAR WARS SIMMING FORUM

Offline SWSF Hoppus

  • Administrator
  • SWSF Member
  • Posts: 2,416
Re: Flashpoint Cantina (OOC)
« Reply #112 on: September 27, 2019, 09:15:38 PM »
;D8-)8-)8-);D

Offline EmperorSeverus

  • Nostalgia
  • SWSF Member
  • Posts: 289
Re: Flashpoint Cantina (OOC)
« Reply #113 on: September 27, 2019, 09:21:21 PM »
Ok. I'm late, but I have posted the IGE-R purchase order without seeing the NR financials. I have to take care of a few things now and will check out the NR budget as soon as I'm home. (Looking forward to it!)
EMPEROR SEVERUS
IMPERIAL GALACTIC EMPIRE - RESURRECTED

Offline SWSF Eidolon

  • Space Pope
  • Administrator
  • SWSF Member
  • Posts: 2,249
Re: Flashpoint Cantina (OOC)
« Reply #114 on: September 27, 2019, 10:22:44 PM »

~J
SWSF 'til Death

Offline SWSF Hale

  • FP Game Master
  • Administrator
  • SWSF Member
  • Posts: 2,220
  • "I find your lack of faith disturbing..."
Re: Flashpoint Cantina (OOC)
« Reply #115 on: September 27, 2019, 11:15:17 PM »
 ;)
LUCIDIUS HALE
STAR WARS SIMMING FORUM

Offline EmperorSeverus

  • Nostalgia
  • SWSF Member
  • Posts: 289
Re: Flashpoint Cantina (OOC)
« Reply #116 on: September 28, 2019, 01:18:30 AM »
Ok gentleman. We have a legit war on our hands.
EMPEROR SEVERUS
IMPERIAL GALACTIC EMPIRE - RESURRECTED

Offline SWSF Hale

  • FP Game Master
  • Administrator
  • SWSF Member
  • Posts: 2,220
  • "I find your lack of faith disturbing..."
Re: Flashpoint Cantina (OOC)
« Reply #117 on: September 28, 2019, 10:57:21 AM »
I hate to be the asshole before we actually play, but I do want to bring to the IR's attention a couple of issues in the interest of having a fair game:

1. Orbital bombardment cannot nuke ground troops, only facilities. Do you plan on invading all of our systems with just 2 meager Lambda Shuttles?

2. While it is not specifically stated in this rule set, in the AJ game players were required to fully load a capital ship with support units upon initial purchase, even if they had no intentions of actually housing those units in that capital ship (in effect sending them elsewhere). The NR's finances were constructed with this mindset, whereas I see that IR's were not.

Honestly I am fine with dispensing with the support unit requirement if the IR is, but in the interest of fairness that would mean we should have the opportunity to revise our finances. Likewise, on account of the possible rules oversight with respect to the extent of orbital bombardment (I take it you probably assumed you could just nuke everything from orbit and call it day), it would seem that you need to go back the drawing board with respect to finances as well. The potential issue with being able to nuke ground troops is that this would in effect create a space-only game. Ground PDF would be pointless, because both factions could simply commit to an orbital bombardment game plan and we'd both wind up nuking each other. We may as well remove ground units from the game if that's the case, and just do space battles.

Here is my offer:
1. We can keep things as-is, since technically both finances are above board in terms of budget.
-OR-
2. We can go back to the drawing board and re-do finances.

The issue with 2 is that we've in a sense already revealed our intended strategies (for the IR it's a VSD spam, for the NR it's a balanced fleet) and thus going back to the drawing board may change our strategies (we may spam RAFs now that a VSD spam is coming). As is the case with table top games with "meta-gaming," OOC knowledge often spoils the IC setup. But if we keep everything as-is, then the IR has already lost the game from the outset because 2 Lambda shuttles vs our collective ground PDF is just a joke. So it seems we have to take option 2.

If we go back to the drawing board, we can either
A. Suspend the support unit requirement.
-or-
B. Uphold the support unit requirement.


Let me know how y'all would like to proceed.
LUCIDIUS HALE
STAR WARS SIMMING FORUM

Offline SWSF Eidolon

  • Space Pope
  • Administrator
  • SWSF Member
  • Posts: 2,249
Re: Flashpoint Cantina (OOC)
« Reply #118 on: September 28, 2019, 01:06:57 PM »

 Theres a Snowden in the punch bowl, repeat, we have an Edward Snowden in the punch bowl.
~J
SWSF 'til Death

Offline SWSF Hoppus

  • Administrator
  • SWSF Member
  • Posts: 2,416
Re: Flashpoint Cantina (OOC)
« Reply #119 on: September 28, 2019, 01:25:23 PM »
Leave it as is. It already took a month to post these!